PKM
my method
process
location
connection
### The core move: separate "what stage is this thought at" from "where does it physically live"
That's the whole source of your confusion in `PKM_structure_ideas.md`. Zettelkasten answers the first question (a **process**, four verbs). PARA answers the second (a **place**, based on actionability). You've been trying to pick one system to answer both questions at once — that's why it hasn't clicked.
### Layer 1 — The Process (applies everywhere, to every note)
Every piece of writing in your vault, no matter the folder, is at one of four stages:
CAPTURE → PROCESS → CONNECT → CREATE
(fleeting) (literature) (permanent) (draft/output)
- **Capture** — a pointer, half-formed, written fast, no polish needed. Your `inbox` folder, phone notes, journal entries as they're written.
- **Process** — you've engaged with a source (a book, an article, _or your own past journal/dream_) and written down what it says plus your reaction. This is where `How to Take Smart Notes. Notes.md` and your dream-analysis work sit.
- **Connect** — you've extracted a standalone claim, passed the three-part test (decontextualized / not-Wikipedia / atomic), and linked it to related notes. This is `00_01-zettel`.
- **Create** — permanent notes assembled into something for an audience: `03-blog`, a project writeup, a portfolio page.
This is the same funnel for _every_ domain in your vault — gardening research, philosophy, career notes, dream analysis. One process, applied everywhere.
### Layer 2 — The Place (your actual folders, relabeled by function not by vibe)
|PARA concept|Your folder|What actually goes here|
|---|---|---|
|**Inbox** (pre-PARA)|`00-raw/inbox`|Capture stage only. Kill the separate "dump" concept — one inbox, not two. If something sits here >2 weeks unprocessed, it's either dead or needs to move.|
|**Reference material**|`00-raw/00_00-archive`|Process stage. External clippings (`/external`) + your own journal/dreams (`/internal`) treated as **literature notes about past-you** — raw, unedited, a source to mine, not a destination.|
|**Permanent notes**|`00-raw/00_01-zettel`|Connect stage. Only notes that pass the three-part test live here.|
|**Projects/Areas**|`01-garden_of_learning`|Active, actionable work. Your emoji system (🌱🌿🪴✅) is _already_ a maturity-status layer inside Projects — don't touch it, it's the best-designed part of this vault.|
|**Resources**|`02-digital_garden`|Curated output for others — book/game/manga lists, blogroll. Public-facing, low-maintenance, doesn't need zettel-rigor.|
|**Archive/Manuscript**|`03-blog`|Create stage. Pulls _from_ zettel notes, doesn't consume them — permanent notes stay put and get reused.|
Notice: **PARA's four categories map onto your five existing top-level folders almost exactly.** You already built this. You just hadn't named the mapping, so it felt like competing systems instead of one system with clear layers.
### Layer 3 — The connective tissue (what was actually missing)
The one thing genuinely absent is a rule for **movement between folders**. Add this:
1. **Every top-level folder gets an `index.md` that acts as a MOC** — you already realized this ("map of content, are my index folders! how did I never realize that"). Formalize it: an index isn't a table of contents, it's a curated entry point linking only to the _matured_ notes in that area, not everything that's ever touched it.
2. **A note only moves folders when its stage changes**, not when you feel like tidying:
- Inbox → Archive: you engaged with it (read it fully, or it's now a finished journal entry).
- Archive → Zettel: it passed the three-part test.
- Zettel → Blog: you're assembling multiple zettels into something for a reader.
3. **Quotes.md stays exactly where it is, as its own category** — a commonplace book isn't inbox, archive, or zettel. It's raw material you're deliberately choosing _not_ to process (you said so yourself: "actually linking/sourcing them is too much effort"). That's a legitimate, permanent fourth bucket — don't force it into the funnel.
### The one-line version, if you want it on a sticky note
**Capture fast in one inbox. Process sources (including your own past self) into archive. Extract only what passes the test into zettel. Build projects and blog posts by pulling zettels together — never by writing from scratch.**
what kind of pkm exists
PARA, GTD, Building a Second Brain, zetelkasten,wittengenstein and ofc endless variations between those
i need to find the right system to write notes??
so first off
definening definitions
-
“refined” notes
-
atomic notes
-
second brain
-
jhonny decibel method
-
wittengenstein
-
zetelkasten
- reference notes
- atomic notes
- fleeting notes
- zettels
-
jhonny decibel
- numbers 00.00
-
linking your thinking
-
PARA:
- Projects,
- Areas,
- Resources
- Archives
-
ACE:
- Atlas
- Calendar
- Efforts
my method
(only for the 00-raw folder, the rest is site oriented and not PKM focused)
pinboard for inbox/dump for articles, then filtered/high quality articles/references/snipits in the appropriate folder, high quality articles will go in the clippings folder.
and quostes will go in the commonplacebook(same)
- raw(folder hidden from public site.)
- clippings(mostly has copied pages i found interesting., via obsidian web clipper. (Need to change name))
- dump/fleeting(the inbox)
- knowledge?(for atomic/evergreen ideas)
- projects(could make this ace or para)
- areas(same with this)
learned things will go in the evergreen/references/atomic/zettel folder.(WIP)
workflow for note taking and thinking and capturing?
most small thoughts go into the inbox folder. some thoughts kinda group together so I have meta folders or notes for them.
this needs to be for like general structure, so what does vault rules serve?
do i wait with writhing notes otherwise i will just have to remove future stuff, no i will keep writhing
Topic tags vs object tag
map of content(MOC), are my index folders!, how did i never realised that?
root of my 00-raw/hidden folder is my inbox folder, but what about the dump folder
inspiration
- “Better note-taking” misses the point; what matters is “better thinking”
- Evergreen notes
- Ideas for my note-taking workflow ¶
- My Zettelkasten workflow from start to finish
- Zettelkasten
- Zettelkasten
- About This Website
- Introduction to the Zettelkasten Method • Zettelkasten Method
- Building a Second Brain The Definitive Introductory Guide
- Wittgenstein
- Personal Knowledge Management System (PKMS)
- Note Taking & Obsidian
- The Ultimate Folder System: A quixotic journey to ACE - Knowledge management - Obsidian Forum
- Quantum OS